Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-4 Turbo

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (NVIDIA) and GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 23 September 2026

As of 23 September 2026, GPT-4 Turbo holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#170 vs #173); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 150× cheaper per output token ($0.20/1M vs $30.00/1M); and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the longer context window (262K vs 128K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…

  • API cost matters — $0.20/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 150× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.05/1M against $10.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 128K.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1361 against 1347.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B was listed 14 December 2025, GPT-4 Turbo 9 April 2024.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #170 against #173 (31.9 vs 30.0 points).

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-4 Turbo: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and GPT-4 Turbo
FieldNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIAGPT-4 TurboOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#173#170
Index score30.031.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.05$10.00
Output price / 1M tokens$0.20$30.00
Context window262K tokens128K tokens
Max output tokens236K4K
API providers listed41
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed14 December 20259 April 2024
PublisherNVIDIAOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-4 Turbo

Public benchmark boards where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-4 Turbo has a published result
BoardNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-4 TurboLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13611350–1371BF1613471340–1354Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GPT-4 Turbo":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-4 Turbo: common questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than GPT-4 Turbo?

GPT-4 Turbo ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 23 September 2026: #170 against #173. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.20/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.05/1M for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and $10.00/1M for GPT-4 Turbo. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.20 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B versus $35.00 for GPT-4 Turbo. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 99.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-4 Turbo?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 128K.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or GPT-4 Turbo?

Arena coding: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 1361, GPT-4 Turbo 1347 — Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads.

Are Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and GPT-4 Turbo open-weight models?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Restricted license. GPT-4 Turbo: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and GPT-4 Turbo?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and 1 for GPT-4 Turbo, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-4 Turbo comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 23 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further