Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Mistral Small 4 (Mistral AI) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Mistral Small 4 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#117 vs #176); Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($0.40/1M vs $0.60/1M); Mistral Small 4 offers the longer context window (262K vs 33K tokens); and Mistral Small 4 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Mistral Small 4 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #117 against #176 (40.7 vs 20.8 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.36/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 33K.
  • you want to self-host: Mistral Small 4 ships open weights while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is restricted license.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mistral Small 4 was listed 16 March 2026, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 19 September 2024.

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…

  • API cost matters — $0.40/1M output tokens against $0.60/1M, about 1.5× cheaper.

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
FieldMistral Small 4Mistral AIQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
ModelCap Index position#117#176
Index score40.720.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.36
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.40
Context window262K tokens33K tokens
Max output tokens210K16K
API providers listed22
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed16 March 202619 September 2024
PublisherMistral AIQwen

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Public benchmark boards where Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has a published result
BoardMistral Small 4Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13551348–1363Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis11.5intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis34.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: common questions

Is Mistral Small 4 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Mistral Small 4 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #117 against #176. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mistral Small 4 cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens: $0.40/1M against $0.60/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for Mistral Small 4 and $0.36/1M for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for Mistral Small 4 versus $0.92 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Mistral Small 4 costs 34.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Mistral Small 4 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 33K.

Which is better for coding, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct open-weight models?

Mistral Small 4: Open weights. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mistral Small 4 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Mistral Small 4 and 2 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further