Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 October 2026

As of 18 October 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #22); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $4.25/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #22 (83.4 vs 77.4 points).
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1494 against 1470.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1535 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark 1.3 was listed 2 September 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Spark 1.3 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldMuse Spark 1.3MetaGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#6#22
Index score83.477.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$4.25$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap944K1.8M
API providers listed11
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, FileText, Image, File
First listed2 September 202631 March 2026
PublisherMetaxAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where Muse Spark 1.3 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardMuse Spark 1.3Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14941489–1500Max14701467–1474Beta · 0309Muse Spark 1.3
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15351526–1544Max15081502–1514Beta · 0309Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena AgentLMArena3.8%3.0%–4.7%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis48.1Max—Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%Max—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis48.7%Max—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)14.6%11.6%–17.5%Muse Code · X-High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #6 against #22. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3 and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 18.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.3 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: Muse Spark 1.3 1535, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508 — Muse Spark 1.3 leads.

Are Muse Spark 1.3 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

Muse Spark 1.3: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Muse Spark 1.3 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Muse Spark 1.3 and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further