Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#2 vs #10); LongCat 2.0 is 3.5× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $4.25/1M); and LongCat 2.0 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 3.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: LongCat 2.0 ships open weights while Muse Spark 1.3 is api only.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #2 against #10 (88.7 vs 79.0 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark 1.3 was listed 2 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Muse Spark 1.3
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanMuse Spark 1.3Meta
ModelCap Index position#10#2
Index score79.088.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$4.25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens262K944K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed20 July 20262 September 2026
PublisherMeituanMeta

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or Muse Spark 1.3 has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0Muse Spark 1.3Leads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis48.2intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis48.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #2 against #10. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3. LongCat 2.0 costs 74.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Muse Spark 1.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and Muse Spark 1.3 open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Muse Spark 1.3: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and Muse Spark 1.3?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 1 for Muse Spark 1.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further