Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#10 vs #28); Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper per output token ($1.10/1M vs $1.20/1M); and LongCat 2.0 offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #10 against #28 (79.0 vs 68.4 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if…

  • API cost matters — $1.10/1M output tokens against $1.20/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Glimmer 30B was listed 9 August 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Muse Glimmer 30B
FieldLongCat 2.0MeituanMuse Glimmer 30BMeta
ModelCap Index position#10#28
Index score79.068.4
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$1.20$1.10
Context window1M tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens262K118K
API providers listed14
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed20 July 20269 August 2026
PublisherMeituanMeta

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (37%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.3% support (21%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 12 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 6 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 8.1 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Public benchmark boards where LongCat 2.0 or Muse Glimmer 30B has a published result
BoardLongCat 2.0Muse Glimmer 30BLeads
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench47.6Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: common questions

Is LongCat 2.0 better than Muse Glimmer 30B?

LongCat 2.0 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #10 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is LongCat 2.0 cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.10/1M against $1.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $0.30/1M for Muse Glimmer 30B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 versus $1.15 for Muse Glimmer 30B. Muse Glimmer 30B costs 4.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, LongCat 2.0 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are LongCat 2.0 and Muse Glimmer 30B open-weight models?

LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Muse Glimmer 30B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run LongCat 2.0 and Muse Glimmer 30B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for LongCat 2.0 and 4 for Muse Glimmer 30B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Glimmer 30B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further