EXAONE 4.0.1 32B (LGAI EXAONE) and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 12 September 2026
As of 12 September 2026, Qwen Drive 1.0 4B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#123 vs #125); and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B ships open weights.
Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 7 resolved peers on 8 rows (91%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.6 up toward the measured corpus · finetune of Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · finetune (100%). Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B
Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.
Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.
EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B: common questions
Is EXAONE 4.0.1 32B better than Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?
Qwen Drive 1.0 4B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 September 2026: #123 against #125. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is EXAONE 4.0.1 32B cheaper than Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?
At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.
Which has the bigger context window, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B or Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?
Both publish a —-token context window.
Which is better for coding, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B or Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B open-weight models?
EXAONE 4.0.1 32B: Restricted license. Qwen Drive 1.0 4B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B?
ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and 0 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 12 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.