Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B (LGAI EXAONE) and Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B (NVIDIA) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 September 2026

As of 13 September 2026, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#122 vs #123).

Which should you choose?

Choose EXAONE 4.0.1 32B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #122 against #123 (36.9 vs 36.3 points).

Choose Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B was listed 18 March 2026, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B 29 July 2025.

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
FieldEXAONE 4.0.1 32BLGAI EXAONENemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNVIDIA
ModelCap Index position#122#123
Index score36.936.3
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Output price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Context window— tokens— tokens
Max output tokens
API providers listed00
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed29 July 202518 March 2026
PublisherLGAI EXAONENVIDIA

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 7 resolved peers on 8 rows (91%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.5 up toward the measured corpus · publisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (58%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 11 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3.3 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

Public benchmark boards where EXAONE 4.0.1 32B or Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B has a published result
BoardEXAONE 4.0.1 32BNemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BLeads
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis20.6%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis53.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis12.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B: common questions

Is EXAONE 4.0.1 32B better than Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B?

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #122 against #123. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is EXAONE 4.0.1 32B cheaper than Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B or Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, EXAONE 4.0.1 32B or Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B open-weight models?

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B: Restricted license. Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and 0 for Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further