Head-to-head comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash (InclusionAI) and Muse Spark Open (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 18 October 2026
As of 18 October 2026, Muse Spark Open holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#16 vs #35); Ling 3.1 Flash is 18.9× cheaper per output token ($0.225/1M vs $4.25/1M); Muse Spark Open offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Ling 3.1 Flash ships open weights.
Evidence: 6 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (82%); global-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (19%); shrunk 4.4 toward the measured corpus · publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (19%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (81%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.9 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.
Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.
Muse Spark Open ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #16 against #35. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.225/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.075/1M for Ling 3.1 Flash and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark Open. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.26 for Ling 3.1 Flash versus $4.63 for Muse Spark Open. Ling 3.1 Flash costs 94.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Muse Spark Open has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Open weights. Muse Spark Open: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Ling 3.1 Flash and 5 for Muse Spark Open, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.