Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step3 VL 10B

Ling 3.0 Flash VL (InclusionAI) and Step3 VL 10B (Stepfun Ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 September 2026

As of 13 September 2026, Step3 VL 10B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#53 vs #55).

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash VL if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 22.0% against 10.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 Flash VL was listed 10 September 2026, Step3 VL 10B 13 January 2026.

Choose Step3 VL 10B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #53 against #55 (59.1 vs 58.0 points).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step3 VL 10B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Step3 VL 10B
FieldLing 3.0 Flash VLInclusionAIStep3 VL 10BStepfun Ai
ModelCap Index position#55#53
Index score58.059.1
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.06Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.18Unlisted
Context window131K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens33K
API providers listed10
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
First listed10 September 202613 January 2026
PublisherInclusionAIStepfun Ai

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · global-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (18%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 4 rows (82%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 4 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 1.5 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step3 VL 10B

Public benchmark boards where Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Step3 VL 10B has a published result
BoardLing 3.0 Flash VLStep3 VL 10BLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis24.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis64.4%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-VL":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis16.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Step3 VL 10B":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis22.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-VL":reasoning=true10.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Step3 VL 10B":reasoning=trueLing 3.0 Flash VL

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step3 VL 10B: common questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than Step3 VL 10B?

Step3 VL 10B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 September 2026: #53 against #55. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL cheaper than Step3 VL 10B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Step3 VL 10B?

Both publish a 131K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Step3 VL 10B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Step3 VL 10B open-weight models?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: Open weights. Step3 VL 10B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Step3 VL 10B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and 0 for Step3 VL 10B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Step3 VL 10B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 13 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further