Gemini 4 Argon (Google) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 13 October 2026
As of 13 October 2026, GPT-5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#17 vs #33); and Gemini 4 Argon is 3× cheaper per output token ($10.00/1M vs $30.00/1M).
Evidence: 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (72%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (28%); shrunk 3.7 toward the measured corpus · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.5
Public benchmark boards where Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.5 has a published result
GPT-5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 October 2026: #17 against #33. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than GPT-5.5?
Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper on output tokens: $10.00/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 4 Argon and $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for Gemini 4 Argon versus $25.00 for GPT-5.5. Gemini 4 Argon costs 64.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.5?
Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.5?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.5 open-weight models?
Gemini 4 Argon: No linked weights. GPT-5.5: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.5?
ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 4 Argon and 3 for GPT-5.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.5 comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 13 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.