Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and Muse Spark Open (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 October 2026

As of 15 October 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #15); and Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper per output token ($3.75/1M vs $4.25/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #15 (83.2 vs 79.6 points).
  • API cost matters — $3.75/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.75/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 40.9 against 38.9.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 87.6% against 76.4%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 47.8% against 43.9%.

Choose Muse Spark Open if…

  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 2.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark Open was listed 15 October 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash 2 September 2026.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark Open: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark Open
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleMuse Spark OpenMeta
ModelCap Index position#6#15
Index score83.279.6
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.75$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$3.75$4.25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K944K
API providers listed24
Weight accessNo linked weightsGated access
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed2 September 202615 October 2026
PublisherGoogleMeta

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (22%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (78%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark Open has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14961492–1501High—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15271520–1535High—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena4.0%2.9%–5.0%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation89.2%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation10.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis40.9High38.9X-HighGemini 3.8 Flash
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis87.6%High76.4%X-HighGemini 3.8 Flash
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.8%High43.9%X-HighGemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark Open: common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Muse Spark Open?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 October 2026: #6 against #15. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $3.75/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.75/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark Open. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.38 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $4.63 for Muse Spark Open. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 27.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.6%, Muse Spark Open 76.4% — Gemini 3.8 Flash leads.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark Open open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: No linked weights. Muse Spark Open: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark Open?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 4 for Muse Spark Open, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark Open comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 15 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further