Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 28 September 2026

As of 28 September 2026, Kimi K3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#8 vs #28); and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 6× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $15.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $15.00/1M, about 6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $3.00/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite was listed 21 July 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #8 against #28 (81.4 vs 71.5 points).
  • you want provider choice — 16 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1541 against 1503.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 60.4% against 10.3%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 43.6 against 22.2.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 46.9% against 18.8%.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K3
FieldGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#28#8
Index score71.581.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$3.00
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$15.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens66K944K
API providers listed216
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video
First listed21 July 202616 July 2026
PublisherGoogleMoonshot AI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardGemini 3.5 Flash LiteKimi K3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15031496–151015411533–1548MaxKimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena—4.5%4.0%–5.1%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation10.3%High60.4%MaxKimi K3
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis22.2Reasoning43.6MaxKimi K3
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis18.8%Reasoning46.9%MaxKimi K3
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench—54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 28 September 2026: #8 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite cheaper than Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $15.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and $3.00/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite versus $13.50 for Kimi K3. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 86.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3?

Arena coding: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1503, Kimi K3 1541 — Kimi K3 leads.

Are Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: API only. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 16 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 28 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further