Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 2 October 2026

As of 2 October 2026, GLM 5.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #12); and GLM 5.3 is 2.7× cheaper per output token ($4.40/1M vs $12.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…

  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1487 against 1479.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 47.0% against 42.3%.

Choose GLM 5.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #12 (80.0 vs 79.2 points).
  • API cost matters — $4.40/1M output tokens against $12.00/1M, about 2.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.40/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 32 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1521 against 1521.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 2.6% against -7.3%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 44.8 against 29.7.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 83.9% against 73.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 5.3 was listed 18 August 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 19 February 2026.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GLM 5.3
FieldGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleGLM 5.3Z.ai
ModelCap Index position#12#11
Index score79.280.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$1.40
Output price / 1M tokens$12.00$4.40
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K131K
API providers listed232
Weight accessNo linked weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoText
First listed19 February 202618 August 2026
PublisherGoogleZ.ai

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.3 has a published result
BoardGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM 5.3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14871484–1490Not reported14791474–1485MaxGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15211517–152615211512–1531MaxGLM 5.3
LMArena AgentLMArena-7.3%-8.3%–-6.4%2.6%1.9%–3.3%MaxGLM 5.3
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis29.7Reasoning44.8MaxGLM 5.3
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis73.8%Reasoning83.9%MaxGLM 5.3
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis95.6%Reasoning—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.0%Reasoning42.3%MaxGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)—41.8%38.6%–45.1%Claude Code · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3: common questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 2 October 2026: #11 against #12. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 is cheaper on output tokens: $4.40/1M against $12.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $1.40/1M for GLM 5.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $5.00 for GLM 5.3. GLM 5.3 costs 50.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.3?

Arena coding: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1521, GLM 5.3 1521 — GLM 5.3 leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.8%, GLM 5.3 83.9% — GLM 5.3 leads.

Are Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GLM 5.3 open-weight models?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: No linked weights. GLM 5.3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GLM 5.3?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 32 for GLM 5.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 2 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further