Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Qwen3.8 27B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#7 vs #16); Qwen3.8 27B is 3.8× cheaper per output token ($3.20/1M vs $12.00/1M); Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3.8 27B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #7 against #16 (78.2 vs 69.6 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.

Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…

  • API cost matters — $3.20/1M output tokens against $12.00/1M, about 3.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.45/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3.8 27B ships open weights while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 2.
  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 52.0 against 47.7.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 27B was listed 14 August 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 19 February 2026.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 27B
FieldGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleQwen3.8 27BQwen
ModelCap Index position#7#16
Index score78.269.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.45
Output price / 1M tokens$12.00$3.20
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K131K
API providers listed23
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoText, Image, Video
First listed19 February 202614 August 2026
PublisherGoogleQwen

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.8 27B has a published result
BoardGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 27BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15211516–1526Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-0.4%-1.2%–0.3%Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis47.7intelligence-index52.0intelligence-indexQwen3.8 27B

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B: common questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #7 against #16. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on output tokens: $3.20/1M against $12.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $0.45/1M for Qwen3.8 27B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.8 27B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 27B open-weight models?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: API only. Qwen3.8 27B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 27B?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 3 for Qwen3.8 27B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further