Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#12 vs #28); Muse Glimmer 30B is 10.9× cheaper per output token ($1.10/1M vs $12.00/1M); Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens); and Muse Glimmer 30B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #12 against #28 (78.4 vs 68.4 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.

Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if…

  • API cost matters — $1.10/1M output tokens against $12.00/1M, about 10.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Muse Glimmer 30B ships open weights while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 2.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Glimmer 30B was listed 9 August 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 19 February 2026.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Glimmer 30B
FieldGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleMuse Glimmer 30BMeta
ModelCap Index position#12#28
Index score78.468.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$12.00$1.10
Context window1M tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens66K118K
API providers listed24
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoText, Image
First listed19 February 20269 August 2026
PublisherGoogleMeta

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (37%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.3% support (21%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 12 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 6 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 8.1 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Glimmer 30B has a published result
BoardGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse Glimmer 30BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15211516–1526Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-5.3%-6.3%–-4.4%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis30.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis73.8%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis95.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview":reasoning=trueOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench47.6Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B: common questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Muse Glimmer 30B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #12 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.10/1M against $12.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $0.30/1M for Muse Glimmer 30B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $1.15 for Muse Glimmer 30B. Muse Glimmer 30B costs 88.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Glimmer 30B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Glimmer 30B open-weight models?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: API only. Muse Glimmer 30B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Glimmer 30B?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 4 for Muse Glimmer 30B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further