Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Qwen3.8 Flash (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, Qwen3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#14 vs #21); Qwen3.8 Flash is 4.2× cheaper per output token ($0.47/1M vs $1.98/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights while Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 20 listed API providers against 2.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 41.0% against 38.0%.

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #14 against #21 (78.0 vs 73.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.47/1M output tokens against $1.98/1M, about 4.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.66/1M.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 39.9 against 36.3.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 86.1% against 78.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Flash was listed 26 August 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 12 August 2026.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Flash
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekQwen3.8 FlashQwen
ModelCap Index position#21#14
Index score73.578.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.66$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$1.98$0.47
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens384K131K
API providers listed202
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed12 August 202626 August 2026
PublisherDeepSeekQwen

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Flash has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15051490–1519HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis36.3intelligence-index:v4.3:max39.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedQwen3.8 Flash
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true86.1%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.8-Flash-Next":reasoning=trueQwen3.8 Flash
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis41.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true38.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8-Flash-Next":reasoning=trueDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #14 against #21. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.47/1M against $1.98/1M. Input tokens are $0.66/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.15/1M for Qwen3.8 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.31 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $0.53 for Qwen3.8 Flash. Qwen3.8 Flash costs 76.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 78.7%, Qwen3.8 Flash 86.1% — Qwen3.8 Flash leads.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Flash open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. Qwen3.8 Flash: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 20 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 2 for Qwen3.8 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further