Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#10 vs #19); and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1× cheaper per output token ($0.28/1M vs $0.60/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you want provider choice — 23 listed API providers against 2.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #10 against #19 (84.4 vs 80.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.28/1M output tokens against $0.60/1M, about 2.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.14/1M against $0.15/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Flash was listed 21 September 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10 September 2026.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#19#10
Index score80.584.4
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.14
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.28
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens384K131K
API providers listed232
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed10 September 202621 September 2026
PublisherDeepSeekXiaomi

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 208 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 7 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeads
LMArena AgentLMArena4.9%3.5%–6.2%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #10 against #19. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.28/1M against $0.60/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.14/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 30.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 23 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 2 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further