Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 21 October 2026

As of 21 October 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#29 vs #70); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.3× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $1.98/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $1.98/1M, about 3.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.66/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 25 listed API providers against 21.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 78.1% against 61.3%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 45.1 against 36.0.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 43.3% against 41.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was listed 17 October 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 12 August 2026.

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #29 against #70 (74.9 vs 61.5 points).

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#70#29
Index score61.574.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.66
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$1.98
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap393K393K
API providers listed2521
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed17 October 202612 August 2026
PublisherDeepSeekDeepSeek

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors (18%); measured predecessor deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash less the succession penalty (69%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (13%); shrunk 0.4 toward the measured corpus · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)—14651458–1471HighOnly one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—15051494–1516HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation78.1%Max61.3%MaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis45.1Max36.0MaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis—78.7%MaxOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.3%Max41.0%MaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 21 October 2026: #29 against #70. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $1.98/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and $0.66/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 versus $2.31 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 74.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: Open weights. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

ModelCap currently lists 25 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and 21 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 21 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further