Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#40 vs #67); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $1.00/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 164K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…

  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 3.

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #40 against #67 (65.2 vs 54.1 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.27/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 164K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 22 September 2025.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FieldDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#67#40
Index score54.165.2
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.27$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.60
Context window164K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens33K384K
API providers listed43
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed22 September 202510 September 2026
PublisherDeepSeekDeepSeek

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (78%); shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14611438–1485ThinkingOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis44.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis8.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: common questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #40 against #67. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.27/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 42.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 164K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash open-weight models?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Open weights. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 3 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further