Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

R1 0528 (DeepSeek) and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, R1 0528 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#58 vs #66); Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper per output token ($2.08/1M vs $2.15/1M); and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B offers the longer context window (262K vs 164K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose R1 0528 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #58 against #66 (57.8 vs 54.1 points).
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1464 against 1459.

Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…

  • API cost matters — $2.08/1M output tokens against $2.15/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.26/1M against $0.50/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 164K.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 4.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was listed 25 February 2026, R1 0528 28 May 2025.

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of R1 0528 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
FieldR1 0528DeepSeekQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
ModelCap Index position#58#66
Index score57.854.1
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.26
Output price / 1M tokens$2.15$2.08
Context window164K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens33K66K
API providers listed45
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
First listed28 May 202525 February 2026
PublisherDeepSeekQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Public benchmark boards where R1 0528 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a published result
BoardR1 0528Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14641453–147514591452–1466R1 0528
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis16.2intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis25.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: common questions

Is R1 0528 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

R1 0528 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #58 against #66. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper on output tokens: $2.08/1M against $2.15/1M. Input tokens are $0.50/1M for R1 0528 and $0.26/1M for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.08 for R1 0528 versus $1.56 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs 24.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 164K.

Which is better for coding, R1 0528 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Arena coding: R1 0528 1464, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1459 — R1 0528 leads.

Are R1 0528 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B open-weight models?

R1 0528: Open weights. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run R1 0528 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for R1 0528 and 5 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this R1 0528 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further