Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance Seed) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, Seed 2.1 Turbo holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#18 vs #27); GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.1× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $2.50/1M); and GPT-5.6 Luna offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #18 against #27 (76.8 vs 70.7 points).
  • you want the more recently listed model — Seed 2.1 Turbo was listed 12 August 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna 9 July 2026.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 2.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.20/1M against $0.50/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Seed 2.1 Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna
FieldSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#18#27
Index score76.870.7
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.20
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$1.20
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens236K128K
API providers listed13
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoFile, Image, Text
First listed12 August 20269 July 2026
PublisherByteDance SeedOpenAI

Evidence: global-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (12%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 3 rows (88%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 3 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 3.1 toward the measured corpus · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Public benchmark boards where Seed 2.1 Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna has a published result
BoardSeed 2.1 TurboGPT-5.6 LunaLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14971489–1505X-HighOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena1.1%0.0%–2.2%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation59.5%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.2%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis37.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis80.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GPT-5.6 Luna (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GPT-5.6 Luna (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)17.3%14.4%–20.1%Codex · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna: common questions

Is Seed 2.1 Turbo better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

Seed 2.1 Turbo ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #18 against #27. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Seed 2.1 Turbo cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.50/1M for Seed 2.1 Turbo and $0.20/1M for GPT-5.6 Luna. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.25 for Seed 2.1 Turbo versus $1.00 for GPT-5.6 Luna. GPT-5.6 Luna costs 55.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 2.1 Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Seed 2.1 Turbo or GPT-5.6 Luna?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Seed 2.1 Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna open-weight models?

Seed 2.1 Turbo: API only. GPT-5.6 Luna: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Seed 2.1 Turbo and GPT-5.6 Luna?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Seed 2.1 Turbo and 3 for GPT-5.6 Luna, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further