Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 October 2026

As of 18 October 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#3 vs #22); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 20× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $50.00/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #3 against #22 (85.8 vs 77.4 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1502 against 1470.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1537 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Fable 5.1 was listed 1 September 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $50.00/1M, about 20× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $10.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#3#22
Index score85.877.4
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$10.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$50.00$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap128K1.8M
API providers listed41
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, File
First listed1 September 202631 March 2026
PublisherAnthropicxAI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardClaude Fable 5.1Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15021496–1508Max14701467–1474Beta · 0309Claude Fable 5.1
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15371526–1549Max15081502–1514Beta · 0309Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena AgentLMArena14.0%12.0%–16.0%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation90.0%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis53.4Reasoning—Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis91.4%Reasoning—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis59.1%Reasoning—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)57.9%54.1%–61.6%Claude Code · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #3 against #22. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $50.00/1M. Input tokens are $10.00/1M for Claude Fable 5.1 and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $45.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 91.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: Claude Fable 5.1 1537, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508 — Claude Fable 5.1 leads.

Are Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

Claude Fable 5.1: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further