Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT vs Ling-2.6-1T

Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT (Aisingapore) and Ling-2.6-1T (InclusionAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 August 2026

As of 18 August 2026, Ling-2.6-1T holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#73 vs #84); and Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT if…

  • you want to self-host: Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT ships open weights while Ling-2.6-1T is api only.

Choose Ling-2.6-1T if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #73 against #84 (36.0 vs 28.4 points).
  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling-2.6-1T was listed 23 April 2026, Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT 16 October 2025.

Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT vs Ling-2.6-1T: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT and Ling-2.6-1T
FieldQwen SEA LION v4 32B ITAisingaporeLing-2.6-1TInclusionAI
ModelCap Index position#84#73
Index score28.436.0
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.075
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.625
Context window— tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens—33K
API providers listed01
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed16 October 202523 April 2026
PublisherAisingaporeInclusionAI

Evidence: finetune · finetune · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT vs Ling-2.6-1T

Public benchmark boards where Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT or Ling-2.6-1T has a published result
BoardQwen SEA LION v4 32B ITLing-2.6-1TLeads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—26.6intelligence-indexOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT vs Ling-2.6-1T: common questions

Is Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT better than Ling-2.6-1T?

Ling-2.6-1T ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 August 2026: #73 against #84. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT or Ling-2.6-1T?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT or Ling-2.6-1T?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT and Ling-2.6-1T open-weight models?

Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT: Open weights. Ling-2.6-1T: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT and Ling-2.6-1T?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT and 1 for Ling-2.6-1T, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen SEA LION v4 32B IT vs Ling-2.6-1T comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 18 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further