Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy Embodied VLM 1.0

Ling-2.6-1T (InclusionAI) and Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 (Tencent) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#73 vs #74); and Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling-2.6-1T if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.

Choose Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #73 against #74 (36.7 vs 36.0 points).
  • you want to self-host: Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 ships open weights while Ling-2.6-1T is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 was listed 14 July 2026, Ling-2.6-1T 23 April 2026.

Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy Embodied VLM 1.0: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling-2.6-1T and Hy Embodied VLM 1.0
FieldLing-2.6-1TInclusionAIHy Embodied VLM 1.0Tencent
ModelCap Index position#74#73
Index score36.036.7
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.075Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.625Unlisted
Context window262K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens33K—
API providers listed10
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed23 April 202614 July 2026
PublisherInclusionAITencent

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy Embodied VLM 1.0

Public benchmark boards where Ling-2.6-1T or Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 has a published result
BoardLing-2.6-1THy Embodied VLM 1.0Leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis26.6intelligence-index—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy Embodied VLM 1.0: common questions

Is Ling-2.6-1T better than Hy Embodied VLM 1.0?

Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #73 against #74. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Ling-2.6-1T cheaper than Hy Embodied VLM 1.0?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling-2.6-1T or Hy Embodied VLM 1.0?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ling-2.6-1T or Hy Embodied VLM 1.0?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling-2.6-1T and Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 open-weight models?

Ling-2.6-1T: API only. Hy Embodied VLM 1.0: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling-2.6-1T and Hy Embodied VLM 1.0?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Ling-2.6-1T and 0 for Hy Embodied VLM 1.0, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy Embodied VLM 1.0 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further