Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Aion-3.0 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Aion-3.0 (Aion Labs) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#109 vs #112); Aion-3.0 is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($6.00/1M vs $10.00/1M); and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max offers the longer context window (400K vs 131K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Aion-3.0 if…

  • API cost matters — $6.00/1M output tokens against $10.00/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Aion-3.0 was listed 7 July 2026, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 4 December 2025.

Choose GPT-5.1-Codex-Max if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #109 against #112 (22.5 vs 22.5 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $3.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 400K tokens against 131K.

Aion-3.0 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Aion-3.0 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
FieldAion-3.0Aion LabsGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#112#109
Index score22.522.5
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$3.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$6.00$10.00
Context window131K tokens400K tokens
Max output tokens33K128K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed7 July 20264 December 2025
PublisherAion LabsOpenAI

Evidence: global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Aion-3.0 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Aion-3.0 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: common questions

Is Aion-3.0 better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #109 against #112. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Aion-3.0 cheaper than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

Aion-3.0 is cheaper on output tokens: $6.00/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $3.00/1M for Aion-3.0 and $1.25/1M for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion-3.0 or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the larger context window: 400K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Aion-3.0 or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Aion-3.0 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max open-weight models?

Aion-3.0: API only. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Aion-3.0 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Aion-3.0 and 1 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Aion-3.0 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further