Skip to content
ModelCap

Qwen3.6 27B

Official publisher releaseOpen weights

Qwen·#148 of 504 in the all-versions archive

Qwen3.6 27B is a language model from Qwen. It ranks #148 of 504 in ModelCap's all-versions archive, with an Index score of 58.9, modeled from its measured predecessor. Its score range of 48.3–69.5 spans positions #91–#227. It is listed at $0.45 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens across 7 providers. It reads up to 262K tokens of context, and its weights are openly downloadable.

Figures as of 6 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · All-versions archive
58.9#148
Modeled from its measured predecessor · range 48.3–69.5
Market Gravity
49.2Decreased by 0.1
Secondary market signal

Superseded by Qwen3.8 27B. It no longer holds a current-board position; its all-versions archive rank is #148.

Input
$0.45
per 1M tokens
Output
$2.70
per 1M tokens
Context
262K
tokens
Providers
7
endpoints

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes
ProviderInputOutputContextQuantUptime
Chutesfp8Cheapest$0.25$2.00262Kfp8100.0%
Alibaba$0.45$2.70262K—100.0%
Reka$0.20$3.00262K—100.0%
DeepInfrafp8$0.32$3.20262Kfp8100.0%
SiliconFlowfp8$0.30$3.20262Kfp8—
Phala$0.32$3.25262K——
Venicefp8$0.325$3.25256Kfp8100.0%

Hugging Face Inference Providers

Exact repository identity

Provider economics and telemetry published by the Hugging Face Router. These are operational signals, not benchmark results.

ProviderInputOutputContextTTFTThroughputFeatures
ovhcloud
live
$0.47$3.19262K529 ms76.5 tok/stools
deepinfra
live
$0.32$3.20262K298 ms63.1 tok/stools · structured
featherless-ai
live
——————

Reported evaluation leads (20)

Not independent measurement

Structured rows reported in this exact model repository at the pinned revision below. They are the publisher talking about itself: never measured evidence, never a score input on their own. Rows marked as used were laddered against independently measured peers inside the launch-card channel of this model's modeled placement, with the replay-measured optimism haircut applied; the others played no part.

Dataset / taskMetricValueRevisionProvenance
benchflow/skillsbench
skillsbench_v1_1
—48.2
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
cais/hle
hle
—24
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
harborframework/terminal-bench-2.0
terminalbench_2
—59.3
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
Idavidrein/gpqa
diamond
—87.8
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
internlm/WildClawBench
overall
—43.2
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
internlm/WildClawBench
avg_time
—421
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
internlm/WildClawBench
avg_cost
—20.91
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MathArena/aime_2026
MathArena/aime_2026
—94.1
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026
MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026
—84.3
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
MBZUAI/longshot-bench
overall
—32.81
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MBZUAI/longshot-bench
core_perception
—25.12
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MBZUAI/longshot-bench
reasoning
—38.55
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MBZUAI/longshot-bench
information
—30.78
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MBZUAI/longshot-bench
multimodal
—36.79
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MMMU/MMMU_Pro
mmmu_pro_vision
—75.8
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
ScaleAI/SWE-bench_Pro
SWE_Bench_Pro
—53.5
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Multilingual
swe_bench_multilingual_%_resolved
—71.3
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Verified
swe_bench_%_resolved
—77.2
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro
mmlu_pro
—86.2
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
VCLab-PolyU/OmniCompass
OmniCompass-VL
—28.6
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate

Other versions (2)

ModelCap Index · All-versions archive

Methodology
58.9
Modeled from its measured predecessor
All-versions archive
#148 of 504
Score range
48.3–69.5
Rank range
#91–#227
Technical details
Public rank basis
Modeled · succession (architecture)
Evidence label
Modeled · succession · publisher-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors (12%); opens above measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.5-27b on same-family ordering evidence (48%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 17 rows (41%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.1 toward the measured corpus
Index support
40.0% · limited
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · qwen/qwen/qwen3.6-27b · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed · artifact metadata Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B@6a9e13bd6fc8f0983b9b99948120bc37f49c13e9 (not the evaluation revision)
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
58.9
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
58.9 ± 8.3
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
-1.1
Peer ceiling share
0%
Optimism haircut
None required · cross lab probe, 5 probes
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
publisher-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors
51.0 ± 23.812%
Family succession · not independent
opens above measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.5-27b on same-family ordering evidence
55.4 ± 12.048%
Launch card against resolved peers · not independent
launch card against 4 resolved peers on 17 rows
65.3 ± 13.041%
  • · Launch card row aime-26: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row erqa: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row gpqa-diamond: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hle: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-2026: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-feb-25: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-nov-25: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row livecodebench-v-6: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-redux: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmmu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmmu: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row nl-2-repo: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row swe-bench-multilingual: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row swe-bench-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row swe-bench-verified: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row terminal-bench-2-0: inside the resolved peer range
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
—
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
—
Coding
—
Agents & tools
—
Reasoning
—
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
13.0
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
99.5
Open reach (HF downloads)
98.7
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
90.3
Freshness
47.8
  • · OpenRouter popularity #159
  • · 7 live providers
  • · HF 30d downloads 2324676
  • · Catalogue: context 262144, reasoning, tools, modalities Text/Image/Video
  • · First seen 2026-04-27

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
50.1
36.1–64.2 uncertainty interval
Excluded from rank
Confidence
78%
Training support
219 models · 128 lineages
Out-of-domain check
in domain
Feature coverage
100%
Lineage-held-out error
8.3 MAE

Experimental estimate. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
74.8
partial · 76% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
85.0
Access & legal clarity
100.0
Deployability
97.5
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Not yet published: the base model it derives from, admitted benchmark results, results across several capability areas, results from more than one source, a confident match to its benchmark entries, pinned evaluation dataset versions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
49.2
OpenRouter weekly popularity
#159 of 339

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
13.0

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
99.5

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
98.7

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
47.8

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Model ID
qwen/qwen3.6-27b
Context window
262K tokens
Declared output cap
66K tokens

OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. OpenRouter metadata

Inputs
Text, Image, Video
Outputs
Text
Tokenizer
Qwen3
Cached input tokens
Not offered
First seen on OpenRouter
27 Apr 2026

Capabilities

  • Supported: Reasoning
  • Supported: Tool use
  • Supported: Structured output
  • Supported: Response format
  • Not supported: Moderated

Weights & access

Open weights. Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI.

Access
Open weights
Licence
apache-2.0
Pinned revision
6a9e13bd6fc8
Parameters
27.8B
Architecture
Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration
Model type
qwen3_5
Hugging Face downloads (30d)
2.3M
Downloads (all time)
30.6M
Likes
2K
Repository updated
24 Apr 2026, 02:39 UTC

Benchmark leaderboards featuring Qwen3.6 27B

All leaderboards
Public benchmark boards on which Qwen3.6 27B has a published result
LeaderboardScoreSource rankConfigurationPublished
WildClawBench OpenClaw leaderboardWildClawBench43.2#20 of 34Default20 Jul 2026

Qwen3.6 27B: common questions

How does Qwen3.6 27B rank among AI models?

Qwen3.6 27B is a superseded version and is not on the current board as of 6 November 2026. Its archive position, where one exists, is shown on the page; the newer version carries the current rank.

How much does Qwen3.6 27B cost per 1M tokens?

Qwen3.6 27B is listed at $0.45 per 1M input tokens and $2.70 per 1M output tokens as of 6 November 2026; the lowest output price among 7 providers is $2.00 on Chutes. Prices come from the OpenRouter catalogue and re-observe on every refresh. For 1,000 requests using 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, the listed rates imply $2.25 total (2M input + 0.5M output). This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the chosen endpoint's rate and limits before budgeting.

What is the context window of Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B has a published context window of 262K tokens (262,144). The snapshot lists a 65,536 token catalogue-declared route output cap. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. The providers table lists each endpoint's context limit.

Is Qwen3.6 27B open-weight?

Open weights (apache-2.0). Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI. The repository is Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B on Hugging Face.

Which API providers serve Qwen3.6 27B?

7 providers serve Qwen3.6 27B through OpenRouter as of 6 November 2026: Reka, Chutes, SiliconFlow, DeepInfra, Phala and Venice and 1 more. Each provider's price, context limit, quantization and measured uptime are in the providers table above.

Which benchmarks has Qwen3.6 27B been evaluated on?

Qwen3.6 27B has published results on 1 public board tracked by ModelCap as of 6 November 2026: WildClawBench OpenClaw 43.2 (#20 of 34). Each board page ranks every tracked model on that benchmark. The ModelCap Index scores the results its methodology admits, with published uncertainty, and shows reference boards without scoring them.

When was Qwen3.6 27B released?

Qwen3.6 27B first appeared in the catalogue on 27 Apr 2026. It has since been superseded by Qwen3.8 27B. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.