Skip to content
ModelCap

Qwen3.5 4B

Current board #109Official publisher releaseOpen weights7d #117 → #109

Qwen·Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B

Qwen3.5 4B is ModelCap current-board rank #109 with Index 38.4 (Modeled · peer benchmarks), from the ModelCap Index as of 9 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC.

Qwen3.5 4B weight access is open weights, from ModelCap classification of published repository metadata as of 9 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC.

Snapshot facts · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · Current board
38.4#109
Estimated · 40% support · score interval 23.7–53.2
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp yet
Market Gravity
9.9
Secondary market signal

OpenRouter endpoint status could not be refreshed. This model is not treated as currently served until a successful observation arrives.

Input
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Output
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Context
tokens
Providers
0
endpoints
Gateway spend
latest · Vercel share

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes

Current provider status is unavailable.

Reported evaluation leads (15)

Not independent measurement

Structured rows reported in this exact model repository at the pinned revision below. They are the publisher talking about itself: never measured evidence, never a score input on their own. Rows marked as used were laddered against independently measured peers inside the launch-card channel of this model's modeled placement, with the replay-measured optimism haircut applied; the others played no part.

Dataset / taskMetricValueRevisionProvenance
Idavidrein/gpqa
diamond
76.2
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
likaixin/ScreenSpot-Pro
overall
60.3
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
LiquidAI/ifstruct-v1.0
ifstruct_v1
36.25
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
mean
82.43
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
short
89.06
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
medium
76.64
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
long
27.31
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
mean
35.4
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
text_content
88.9
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
text_formatting
57.8
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
layout
19.7
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
chart
2.5
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
table
8
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MMMU/MMMU_Pro
mmmu_pro_vision
66.3
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro
mmlu_pro
79.1
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate

ModelCap Index · Current board

Methodology
38.4
Modeled · peer benchmarks · calibrated architecture-and-release-era fallback from static public metadata
Current board
#109
Public rank basis
Modeled · peer benchmarks (architecture)
Index support
40.0% · limited
Index interval
23.7–53.2
Rank posterior
Not available
Top 5 / Top 10 probability
Not available / Not available
Posterior as of
Snapshot timestamp unavailable
Evidence as of
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · qwen/Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed · artifact metadata Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B@851bf6e806efd8d0a36b00ddf55e13ccb7b8cd0a (not the evaluation revision)
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
38.4
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
38.4 ± 11.5
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
+4.1
Peer ceiling share
20%
Optimism haircut
−0.6 points · cross lab probe, 2 probes
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors
49.7 ± 22.327%
Launch card against resolved peers · not independent
launch card against 3 resolved peers on 10 rows
34.3 ± 13.573%
  • · Launch card row aa-lcr: claims above every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row gpqa-diamond: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-feb-25: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row hmmt-nov-25: claims below every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row ifbench: claims below every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row ifeval: claims above every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row livecodebench-v-6: claims below every resolved peer
  • · Launch card row mmlu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-prox: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-redux: inside the resolved peer range
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
Coding
Agents & tools
Reasoning
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
Open reach (HF downloads)
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
15.0
Freshness
47.7
  • · Catalogue: modalities Text/Image
  • · First seen 2026-02-27

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
Estimator abstained

uncertainty-above-gate

Feature coverage
71%
Training support
187 models · 107 lineages

uncertainty-above-gate. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
52.4
partial · 56% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
100.0
Access & legal clarity
100.0
Deployability
8.0
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Missing: deployability.independent-provider-records, deployability.measured-provider-uptime, deployability.published-provider-pricing, deployability.declared-capacity, evaluationProvenance.admitted-evaluation-observations, evaluationProvenance.capability-family-breadth, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-source-diversity, evaluationProvenance.identity-and-source-confidence, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-dataset-revisions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
9.9
OpenRouter weekly popularity
Not listed

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
0.0

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
0.0

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
50.0

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
47.7

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Context window
tokens
Max output
Inputs
Text, Image
Outputs
Text
Tokenizer
Cached input tokens
Not offered
First seen on OpenRouter
27 Feb 2026

Capabilities

  • Not supported: Reasoning
  • Not supported: Tool use
  • Not supported: Structured output
  • Not supported: Response format
  • Not supported: Moderated

Weights & access

Open weights. Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI.

Access
Open weights
Licence
apache-2.0
Pinned revision
851bf6e806ef
Parameters
4.7B
Architecture
Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration
Model type
qwen3_5
Hugging Face downloads (30d)
Downloads (all time)
Likes
Repository
Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B
Repository updated
2 Mar 2026, 00:52 UTC

Metadata status: stale · HTTP 429.

Compare Qwen3.5 4B with

Pick any model

Benchmark leaderboards featuring Qwen3.5 4B

All leaderboards
Public benchmark boards on which Qwen3.5 4B has a published result
LeaderboardScoreSource rankConfigurationPublished
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis25.8%#166 of 236terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 4B":reasoning=true9 Sept 2026
τ²-Bench Telecom (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis92.1%#55 of 436tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 4B":reasoning=true9 Sept 2026
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis9.9%#281 of 603hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 4B":reasoning=true9 Sept 2026

Alternatives to Qwen3.5 4B, by the numbers

Ranked neighbours

Models within 3 places of #109 on the ModelCap Index.

Other ranked Qwen models

The same publisher's other current models with a public Index position.

Qwen3.5 4B: common questions

How does Qwen3.5 4B rank among AI models?

Qwen3.5 4B holds ModelCap Index position #109 of 160 ranked language models as of 9 September 2026, with an Index score of 38.4 (interval 23.7–53.2); evidence: modeled · peer benchmarks. The Index combines public benchmark boards with published uncertainty; the methodology page explains the weighting.

How much does Qwen3.5 4B cost per 1M tokens?

No live API price is listed for Qwen3.5 4B in the current snapshot as of 9 September 2026 because the latest endpoint refresh was unavailable. ModelCap shows a price only when a provider currently lists one.

Is Qwen3.5 4B open-weight?

Open weights (apache-2.0). Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI. The repository is Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B on Hugging Face.

Which benchmarks has Qwen3.5 4B been evaluated on?

Qwen3.5 4B has published results on 3 public boards tracked by ModelCap as of 9 September 2026: AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 25.8% (#166 of 236), AA τ²-Bench Telecom 92.1% (#55 of 436) and AA Humanity's Last Exam 9.9% (#281 of 603). Each board page ranks every tracked model on that benchmark; the ModelCap Index combines them with published uncertainty.

How does Qwen3.5 4B compare with Gemma SEA LION v4.5 E2B IT?

Qwen3.5 4B ranks #109 (Index 38.4) and Gemma SEA LION v4.5 E2B IT ranks #110 (Index 38.1) on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026. The head-to-head page lines up their benchmarks, listed prices, context windows and provider counts side by side.

When was Qwen3.5 4B released?

Qwen3.5 4B first appeared in the catalogue on 27 Feb 2026. It is the current version in its family. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.