Skip to content
ModelCap

gemma 4 E4B it

Current board #98Official publisher releaseOpen weights

Google·google/gemma-4-E4B-it

gemma 4 E4B it is ModelCap current-board rank #98 with Index 41.1 (Modeled · peer benchmarks), from the ModelCap Index as of 9 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC.

gemma 4 E4B it weight access is open weights, from ModelCap classification of published repository metadata as of 9 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC.

Snapshot facts · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · Current board
41.1#98
Estimated · 29% support · score interval 33.7–48.5
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp yet
Market Gravity
17.3
Secondary market signal

OpenRouter endpoint status could not be refreshed. This model is not treated as currently served until a successful observation arrives.

Input
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Output
Self-hosted
weights only · no listed API price
Context
tokens
Providers
0
endpoints
Gateway spend
latest · Vercel share

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes

Current provider status is unavailable.

Reported evaluation leads (15)

Not independent measurement

Structured rows reported in this exact model repository at the pinned revision below. They are the publisher talking about itself: never measured evidence, never a score input on their own. Rows marked as used were laddered against independently measured peers inside the launch-card channel of this model's modeled placement, with the replay-measured optimism haircut applied; the others played no part.

Dataset / taskMetricValueRevisionProvenance
Idavidrein/gpqa
diamond
58.6
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
LiquidAI/ifstruct-v1.0
ifstruct_v1
76.65
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
mean
69.64
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
short
81.1
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
medium
48.93
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ExtractBench
long
26.82
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
mean
40.5
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
text_content
81.4
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
text_formatting
52.5
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
layout
35.8
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
chart
7.7
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
llamaindex/ParseBench
table
25
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MathArena/aime_2026
MathArena/aime_2026
42.5
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Not used in launch estimate
MMMU/MMMU_Pro
mmmu_pro_vision
52.6
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate
TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro
mmlu_pro
69.4
Unpinned
not published
Reported
Used in launch estimate

ModelCap Index · Current board

Methodology
41.1
Modeled · peer benchmarks · calibrated architecture-and-release-era fallback from static public metadata
Current board
#98
Public rank basis
Modeled · peer benchmarks (architecture)
Index support
29.0% · limited
Index interval
33.7–48.5
Rank posterior
Not available
Top 5 / Top 10 probability
Not available / Not available
Posterior as of
Snapshot timestamp unavailable
Evidence as of
No admitted evaluation publication timestamp
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · google/google/gemma-4-E4B-it · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed · artifact metadata google/gemma-4-E4B-it@ee0ef6023621cff504d758262d4e04895a5af4a2 (not the evaluation revision)
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
41.1
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
41.1 ± 5.8
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
+1.7
Peer ceiling share
0%
Optimism haircut
None applied
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors
65.0 ± 22.37%
Launch card against resolved peers · not independent
launch card against 3 resolved peers on 5 rows
39.4 ± 6.093%
  • · Launch card row aime-2026-without-tools: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row gpqa-diamond: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row livecodebench-v-6: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmlu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
  • · Launch card row mmmu-pro: inside the resolved peer range
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
Coding
Agents & tools
Reasoning
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
Open reach (HF downloads)
99.2
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
15.0
Freshness
48.3
  • · HF 30d downloads 4805395
  • · Catalogue: modalities Text/Image/Audio
  • · First seen 2026-03-02

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
49.0
29.1–68.9 uncertainty interval
Excluded from rank
Confidence
67%
Training support
187 models · 107 lineages
Out-of-domain check
in domain
Feature coverage
71%
Lineage-held-out error
10.4 MAE

Experimental estimate. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
52.4
partial · 56% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
100.0
Access & legal clarity
100.0
Deployability
8.0
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Missing: deployability.independent-provider-records, deployability.measured-provider-uptime, deployability.published-provider-pricing, deployability.declared-capacity, evaluationProvenance.admitted-evaluation-observations, evaluationProvenance.capability-family-breadth, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-source-diversity, evaluationProvenance.identity-and-source-confidence, evaluationProvenance.evaluation-dataset-revisions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
17.3
OpenRouter weekly popularity
Not listed

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
0.0

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
0.0

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
99.2

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
48.3

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Context window
tokens
Max output
Inputs
Text, Image, Audio
Outputs
Text, Image, Audio
Tokenizer
Cached input tokens
Not offered
First seen on OpenRouter
2 Mar 2026

Capabilities

  • Not supported: Reasoning
  • Not supported: Tool use
  • Not supported: Structured output
  • Not supported: Response format
  • Not supported: Moderated

Weights & access

Open weights. Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI.

Access
Open weights
Licence
apache-2.0
Pinned revision
ee0ef6023621
Parameters
8.0B
Architecture
Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration
Model type
gemma4
Hugging Face downloads (30d)
4.8M
Downloads (all time)
30.1M
Likes
2K
Repository updated
20 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC
Base lineage
google/gemma-4-E4B

Compare gemma 4 E4B it with

Pick any model

Alternatives to gemma 4 E4B it, by the numbers

Ranked neighbours

Models within 3 places of #98 on the ModelCap Index.

Other ranked Google models

The same publisher's other current models with a public Index position.

gemma 4 E4B it: common questions

How does gemma 4 E4B it rank among AI models?

gemma 4 E4B it holds ModelCap Index position #98 of 160 ranked language models as of 9 September 2026, with an Index score of 41.1 (interval 33.7–48.5); evidence: modeled · peer benchmarks. The Index combines public benchmark boards with published uncertainty; the methodology page explains the weighting.

How much does gemma 4 E4B it cost per 1M tokens?

No live API price is listed for gemma 4 E4B it in the current snapshot as of 9 September 2026 because the latest endpoint refresh was unavailable. ModelCap shows a price only when a provider currently lists one.

Is gemma 4 E4B it open-weight?

Open weights (apache-2.0). Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI. The repository is google/gemma-4-E4B-it on Hugging Face.

Which benchmarks has gemma 4 E4B it been evaluated on?

gemma 4 E4B it's Index position rests on the evidence listed on this page; it has no result on the public boards ModelCap tracks as separate leaderboards as of 9 September 2026. The evidence panel names each source and its publication date.

How does gemma 4 E4B it compare with Qwen3.5-9B?

gemma 4 E4B it ranks #98 (Index 41.1) and Qwen3.5-9B ranks #97 (Index 41.1) on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026. The head-to-head page lines up their benchmarks, listed prices, context windows and provider counts side by side.

When was gemma 4 E4B it released?

gemma 4 E4B it first appeared in the catalogue on 2 Mar 2026. It is the current version in its family. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.