Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Hy3 and GLM 5.3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

Hy3 vs GLM 5.3

Live dataset updated 8/19/2026, 2:25:16 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of Hy3 and GLM 5.3
Field	Hy3 Tencent	GLM 5.3 Z.ai
ModelCap position	#19	#7
Index score	67.8	78.4
Evidence	Measured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards	Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M	$0.132	$1.40
Output / 1M	$0.528	$4.40
Pricing status	fresh	fresh
Context	262K	1M
Providers	6	1
Weight access	Open weights	API only

Decision facts

Hy3 is #19; GLM 5.3 is #7 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 67.8 for Hy3 and 78.4 for GLM 5.3.
Both positions use Measured evidence.
Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.53 for Hy3 and $4.40 for GLM 5.3.
Published context is 262,144 tokens for Hy3 and 1,048,576 for GLM 5.3.
Weight access differs: Hy3 is open; GLM 5.3 is none.
ModelCap currently lists 6 providers for Hy3 and 1 for GLM 5.3.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.