Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Hy-MT2-1.8B and Hy3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy3

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 8:25:40 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Hy-MT2-1.8B and Hy3
Field
Hy3

Tencent

ModelCap position#76#20
Index score36.967.8
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards
Input / 1M$0.044$0.132
Output / 1M$0.177$0.528
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context8K262K
Providers16
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Hy-MT2-1.8B is #76; Hy3 is #20 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 36.9 for Hy-MT2-1.8B and 67.8 for Hy3.
  • Evidence differs: Hy-MT2-1.8B is Estimated; Hy3 is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.18 for Hy-MT2-1.8B and $0.53 for Hy3.
  • Published context is 8,192 tokens for Hy-MT2-1.8B and 262,144 for Hy3.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Hy-MT2-1.8B and 6 for Hy3.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.