Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.8 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.8 27B

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 5:52:28 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.8 27B
Field
ModelCap position#12#18
Index score74.268.4
EvidenceEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimismMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.45
Output / 1MUnavailable$3.20
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context1M
Providers07
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ornith 1.5 397B is #12; Qwen3.8 27B is #18 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 74.2 for Ornith 1.5 397B and 68.4 for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • Evidence differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated; Qwen3.8 27B is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ornith 1.5 397B and 7 for Qwen3.8 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.