Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Kimi K2 Thinking and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 5:39:50 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Kimi K2 Thinking and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
Field
Kimi K2 Thinking

Moonshot AI

ModelCap position#32#33
Index score59.058.3
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1M$0.60Unavailable
Output / 1M$2.50Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K
Providers20
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Kimi K2 Thinking is #32; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is #33 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 59.0 for Kimi K2 Thinking and 58.3 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B.
  • Evidence differs: Kimi K2 Thinking is Measured; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Kimi K2 Thinking is restricted; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Kimi K2 Thinking and 0 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.