Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Muse Glimmer 30B and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor

Live dataset updated 8/22/2026, 12:43:30 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Muse Glimmer 30B and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Field
ModelCap position#191#39
Index score16.154.7
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.30$0.10
Output / 1M$1.10$0.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K1M
Providers51
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Muse Glimmer 30B is #191; Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is #39 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 16.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B and 54.7 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.
  • Evidence differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is Measured; Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.10 for Muse Glimmer 30B and $0.20 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1,048,576 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.
  • Weight access differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is open; Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1 for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.