Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with llm jp 4 33b thinking and Mage VL, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

llm jp 4 33b thinking vs Mage VL

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 5:39:50 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of llm jp 4 33b thinking and Mage VL
Field
Mage VL

Microsoft

ModelCap position#153#155
Index score21.721.7
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • llm jp 4 33b thinking is #153; Mage VL is #155 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 21.7 for llm jp 4 33b thinking and 21.7 for Mage VL.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.