Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-3.0-flash and GPT-5.4 Nano, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-3.0-flash vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Live dataset updated 8/19/2026, 2:38:10 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and GPT-5.4 Nano
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#41#44
Index score53.052.6
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1M$0.021$0.20
Output / 1M$0.063$1.25
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K400K
Providers22
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ling-3.0-flash is #41; GPT-5.4 Nano is #44 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash and 52.6 for GPT-5.4 Nano.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash and $1.25 for GPT-5.4 Nano.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-3.0-flash and 400,000 for GPT-5.4 Nano.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-3.0-flash is open; GPT-5.4 Nano is none.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.