Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-2.6-1T and Hy-MT2-1.8B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-2.6-1T vs Hy-MT2-1.8B

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 8:25:40 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-2.6-1T and Hy-MT2-1.8B
Field
Ling-2.6-1T

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#79#76
Index score36.036.9
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.075$0.044
Output / 1M$0.625$0.177
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K8K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ling-2.6-1T is #79; Hy-MT2-1.8B is #76 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 36.0 for Ling-2.6-1T and 36.9 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Evidence differs: Ling-2.6-1T is Measured; Hy-MT2-1.8B is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.63 for Ling-2.6-1T and $0.18 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-2.6-1T and 8,192 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-2.6-1T is none; Hy-MT2-1.8B is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.