Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 4 31B and Ornith 1.5 397B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 4 31B vs Ornith 1.5 397B

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 5:39:50 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 4 31B and Ornith 1.5 397B
Field
ModelCap position#30#12
Index score60.674.2
EvidenceMeasured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boardsEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1M$0.09Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.34Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K—
Providers150
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 4 31B is #30; Ornith 1.5 397B is #12 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 60.6 for Gemma 4 31B and 74.2 for Ornith 1.5 397B.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 4 31B is Measured; Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 15 providers for Gemma 4 31B and 0 for Ornith 1.5 397B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.