Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Opus 5 and Ornith 1.5 397B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Opus 5 vs Ornith 1.5 397B

Live dataset updated 8/20/2026, 5:39:50 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Opus 5 and Ornith 1.5 397B
Field
Claude Opus 5

Anthropic

ModelCap position#2#12
Index score83.274.2
EvidenceMeasured6 public benchmark observations across 6 boardsEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1M$5.00Unavailable
Output / 1M$25.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context1M
Providers50
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Claude Opus 5 is #2; Ornith 1.5 397B is #12 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 83.2 for Claude Opus 5 and 74.2 for Ornith 1.5 397B.
  • Evidence differs: Claude Opus 5 is Measured; Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Claude Opus 5 is none; Ornith 1.5 397B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Claude Opus 5 and 0 for Ornith 1.5 397B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.