Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GLM 4 32B 0414 vs GLM 4.6V Flash

GLM 4 32B 0414 (Zai Org) and GLM 4.6V Flash (Zai Org) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, GLM 4 32B 0414 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#166 vs #167); and GLM 4.6V Flash offers the longer context window (131K vs 32K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GLM 4 32B 0414 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #166 against #167 (22.5 vs 22.5 points).

Choose GLM 4.6V Flash if…

  • you need the longer context window — 131K tokens against 32K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 4.6V Flash was listed 7 December 2025, GLM 4 32B 0414 7 April 2025.

GLM 4 32B 0414 vs GLM 4.6V Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GLM 4 32B 0414 and GLM 4.6V Flash
FieldGLM 4 32B 0414Zai OrgGLM 4.6V FlashZai Org
ModelCap Index position#166#167
Index score22.522.5
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Output price / 1M tokensUnlistedUnlisted
Context window32K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens——
API providers listed00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed7 April 20257 December 2025
PublisherZai OrgZai Org

Evidence: global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GLM 4 32B 0414 vs GLM 4.6V Flash

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GLM 4 32B 0414 vs GLM 4.6V Flash: common questions

Is GLM 4 32B 0414 better than GLM 4.6V Flash?

GLM 4 32B 0414 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #166 against #167. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is GLM 4 32B 0414 cheaper than GLM 4.6V Flash?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4 32B 0414 or GLM 4.6V Flash?

GLM 4.6V Flash has the larger context window: 131K tokens against 32K.

Which is better for coding, GLM 4 32B 0414 or GLM 4.6V Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are GLM 4 32B 0414 and GLM 4.6V Flash open-weight models?

GLM 4 32B 0414: Open weights. GLM 4.6V Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run GLM 4 32B 0414 and GLM 4.6V Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for GLM 4 32B 0414 and 0 for GLM 4.6V Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GLM 4 32B 0414 vs GLM 4.6V Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further