Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs UI Mate 27B

Hy-MT2-1.8B (Tencent) and UI Mate 27B (Tencent) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 20 August 2026

As of 20 August 2026, UI Mate 27B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#51 vs #76).

Which should you choose?

Choose Hy-MT2-1.8B if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Hy-MT2-1.8B was listed 20 August 2026, UI Mate 27B 14 August 2026.

Choose UI Mate 27B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #51 against #76 (50.0 vs 36.9 points).

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs UI Mate 27B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Hy-MT2-1.8B and UI Mate 27B
FieldHy-MT2-1.8BTencentUI Mate 27BTencent
ModelCap Index position#76#51
Index score36.950.0
EvidenceEstimatedInherited
Input price / 1M tokens$0.044Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$0.177Unlisted
Context window8K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens4K
API providers listed10
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed20 August 202614 August 2026
PublisherTencentTencent

Evidence: publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · finetune · finetune. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Hy-MT2-1.8B vs UI Mate 27B

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs UI Mate 27B: common questions

Is Hy-MT2-1.8B better than UI Mate 27B?

UI Mate 27B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 20 August 2026: #51 against #76. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Hy-MT2-1.8B cheaper than UI Mate 27B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy-MT2-1.8B or UI Mate 27B?

Both publish a 8K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Hy-MT2-1.8B or UI Mate 27B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Hy-MT2-1.8B and UI Mate 27B open-weight models?

Hy-MT2-1.8B: Open weights. UI Mate 27B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Hy-MT2-1.8B and UI Mate 27B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Hy-MT2-1.8B and 0 for UI Mate 27B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Hy-MT2-1.8B vs UI Mate 27B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 20 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further