Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy-MT2-7B

Hy-MT2-1.8B (Tencent) and Hy-MT2-7B (Tencent) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Hy-MT2-1.8B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#72 vs #74); and Hy-MT2-1.8B is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($0.177/1M vs $0.295/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Hy-MT2-1.8B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #72 against #74 (38.9 vs 38.9 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.177/1M output tokens against $0.295/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.044/1M against $0.074/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Hy-MT2-1.8B was listed 20 August 2026, Hy-MT2-7B 19 August 2026.

Choose Hy-MT2-7B if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Hy-MT2-7B leads Hy-MT2-1.8B for this pair.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy-MT2-7B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Hy-MT2-1.8B and Hy-MT2-7B
FieldHy-MT2-1.8BTencentHy-MT2-7BTencent
ModelCap Index position#72#74
Index score38.938.9
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.044$0.074
Output price / 1M tokens$0.177$0.295
Context window8K tokens8K tokens
Max output tokens4K4K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed20 August 202619 August 2026
PublisherTencentTencent

Evidence: publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · publisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy-MT2-7B

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy-MT2-7B: common questions

Is Hy-MT2-1.8B better than Hy-MT2-7B?

Hy-MT2-1.8B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #72 against #74. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Hy-MT2-1.8B cheaper than Hy-MT2-7B?

Hy-MT2-1.8B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.177/1M against $0.295/1M. Input tokens are $0.044/1M for Hy-MT2-1.8B and $0.074/1M for Hy-MT2-7B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Hy-MT2-7B?

Both publish a 8K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Hy-MT2-7B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Hy-MT2-1.8B and Hy-MT2-7B open-weight models?

Hy-MT2-1.8B: Open weights. Hy-MT2-7B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Hy-MT2-1.8B and Hy-MT2-7B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Hy-MT2-1.8B and 1 for Hy-MT2-7B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Hy-MT2-7B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further