Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Fugu Ultra vs Sakana Namazu

Fugu Ultra (Sakana AI) and Sakana Namazu (Sakana AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Fugu Ultra holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#156 vs #157); Sakana Namazu is 7.5× cheaper per output token ($4.00/1M vs $30.00/1M); and Fugu Ultra offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Fugu Ultra if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #156 against #157 (22.5 vs 22.5 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.

Choose Sakana Namazu if…

  • API cost matters — $4.00/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 7.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.95/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Sakana Namazu was listed 11 August 2026, Fugu Ultra 24 June 2026.

Fugu Ultra vs Sakana Namazu: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Fugu Ultra and Sakana Namazu
FieldFugu UltraSakana AISakana NamazuSakana AI
ModelCap Index position#156#157
Index score22.522.5
EvidenceEstimatedEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.95
Output price / 1M tokens$30.00$4.00
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens128K66K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, File
First listed24 June 202611 August 2026
PublisherSakana AISakana AI

Evidence: global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated · global corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Fugu Ultra vs Sakana Namazu

Neither model has a published result on a public benchmark board ModelCap tracks yet.

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Fugu Ultra vs Sakana Namazu: common questions

Is Fugu Ultra better than Sakana Namazu?

Fugu Ultra ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #156 against #157. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Fugu Ultra cheaper than Sakana Namazu?

Sakana Namazu is cheaper on output tokens: $4.00/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $5.00/1M for Fugu Ultra and $0.95/1M for Sakana Namazu. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Fugu Ultra or Sakana Namazu?

Fugu Ultra has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Fugu Ultra or Sakana Namazu?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Fugu Ultra and Sakana Namazu open-weight models?

Fugu Ultra: API only. Sakana Namazu: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Fugu Ultra and Sakana Namazu?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Fugu Ultra and 1 for Sakana Namazu, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Fugu Ultra vs Sakana Namazu comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further