Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#104 vs #117); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 1.2× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $1.20/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #104 against #117 (52.3 vs 46.7 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $1.20/1M, about 1.2× cheaper.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1458 against 1422.

Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking if…

  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking was listed 11 September 2025, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 23 July 2025.

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
FieldQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwenQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
ModelCap Index position#104#117
Index score52.346.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$1.20
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K236K
API providers listed52
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed23 July 202511 September 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a published result
BoardQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14581449–146714221410–1433Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)55.4%—Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis43.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct":reasoning=false—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis4.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct":reasoning=false—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: common questions

Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #104 against #117. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $1.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and $0.15/1M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B versus $0.90 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 18.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Arena coding: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 1458, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 1422 — Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B leads.

Are Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking open-weight models?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 2 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further