Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#32 vs #85); Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 6× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $6.00/1M); Qwen3.8 Max (0902) offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #32 against #85 (66.6 vs 46.0 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was listed 3 September 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 23 July 2025.

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…

  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
FieldQwen3.8 Max (0902)QwenQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
ModelCap Index position#32#85
Index score66.646.0
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$6.00$1.00
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens131K66K
API providers listed15
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
First listed3 September 202623 July 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.7-max (78%); shrunk 4.9 toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has a published result
BoardQwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14581449–1467Only one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)55.4%Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis43.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3 Coder 480B":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis4.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3 Coder 480B":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: common questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #32 against #85. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) versus $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs 84.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B open-weight models?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902): API only. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further