Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Qwen3.7 Plus holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#30 vs #92); Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.1× cheaper per output token ($1.28/1M vs $4.00/1M); Qwen3.7 Plus offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens); and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.7 Plus if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #30 against #92 (73.4 vs 54.6 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.28/1M output tokens against $4.00/1M, about 3.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.32/1M against $0.40/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1501 against 1453.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.7 Plus was listed 3 June 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 23 September 2025.

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ships open weights while Qwen3.7 Plus is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
FieldQwen3.7 PlusQwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen
ModelCap Index position#30#92
Index score73.454.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.32$0.40
Output price / 1M tokens$1.28$4.00
Context window1M tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens131K33K
API providers listed12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
First listed3 June 202623 September 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has a published result
BoardQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15011494–150814531439–1468Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena AgentLMArena-6.1%-7.3%–-4.9%—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis25.2intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified—Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.0%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.7 Plus":reasoning=true—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis35.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.7 Plus":reasoning=true—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: common questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3.7 Plus ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #30 against #92. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on output tokens: $1.28/1M against $4.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.32/1M for Qwen3.7 Plus and $0.40/1M for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.28 for Qwen3.7 Plus versus $2.80 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 54.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Arena coding: Qwen3.7 Plus 1501, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 1453 — Qwen3.7 Plus leads.

Are Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking open-weight models?

Qwen3.7 Plus: API only. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3.7 Plus and 2 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further