Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Open2 250B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) and Solar Open2 250B (Upstage) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#42 vs #51); and Qwen3.5 397B A17B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #42 against #51 (63.4 vs 60.3 points).
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3.5 397B A17B ships open weights while Solar Open2 250B is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 0.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 29.0% against 28.5%.

Choose Solar Open2 250B if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Solar Open2 250B was listed 22 July 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 16 February 2026.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Open2 250B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Open2 250B
FieldQwen3.5 397B A17BQwenSolar Open2 250BUpstage
ModelCap Index position#42#51
Index score63.460.3
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.55Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$3.50Unlisted
Context window262K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens236K
API providers listed100
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
First listed16 February 202622 July 2026
PublisherQwenUpstage

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (23%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 4 rows (77%); exceeds every named peer on 4 of 4 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 6 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Open2 250B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Open2 250B has a published result
BoardQwen3.5 397B A17BSolar Open2 250BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14911486–1496Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis19.1intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis95.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis29.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)":reasoning=true28.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Solar Open2 250B":reasoning=trueQwen3.5 397B A17B

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Open2 250B: common questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Solar Open2 250B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #42 against #51. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than Solar Open2 250B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Open2 250B?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Solar Open2 250B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Open2 250B open-weight models?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Open weights. Solar Open2 250B: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Solar Open2 250B?

ModelCap currently lists 10 API providers for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 0 for Solar Open2 250B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Solar Open2 250B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further