Qwen3 235B A22B (Qwen) and Inkling Small (Thinking Machines) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 15 September 2026
As of 15 September 2026, Inkling Small holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#70 vs #82); Inkling Small is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $1.82/1M); and Inkling Small offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Inkling Small
Public benchmark boards where Qwen3 235B A22B or Inkling Small has a published result
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Inkling Small: common questions
Is Qwen3 235B A22B better than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #70 against #82. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Qwen3 235B A22B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $1.82/1M. Input tokens are $0.455/1M for Qwen3 235B A22B and $0.45/1M for Inkling Small. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.82 for Qwen3 235B A22B versus $1.50 for Inkling Small. Inkling Small costs 17.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B or Inkling Small?
Inkling Small has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K.
Which is better for coding, Qwen3 235B A22B or Inkling Small?
Arena coding: Qwen3 235B A22B 1445, Inkling Small 1474 — Inkling Small leads.
Are Qwen3 235B A22B and Inkling Small open-weight models?
Qwen3 235B A22B: Open weights. Inkling Small: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Qwen3 235B A22B and Inkling Small?
ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3 235B A22B and 3 for Inkling Small, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Qwen3 235B A22B vs Inkling Small comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.