Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Laguna S 2.1 (Poolside) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 September 2026

As of 3 September 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#65 vs #68); Laguna S 2.1 is 5.6× cheaper per output token ($0.18/1M vs $1.00/1M); Laguna S 2.1 offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Laguna S 2.1 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.18/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 5.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.09/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Laguna S 2.1 was listed 21 July 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 23 July 2025.

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #65 against #68 (41.3 vs 40.3 points).
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights while Laguna S 2.1 is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
FieldLaguna S 2.1PoolsideQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
ModelCap Index position#68#65
Index score40.341.3
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.09$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$0.18$1.00
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens131K66K
API providers listed15
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed21 July 202623 July 2025
PublisherPoolsideQwen

Evidence: placed against measured peers on publisher-reported benchmarks, discounted for self-report optimism · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Public benchmark boards where Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has a published result
BoardLaguna S 2.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14581449–1467Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis18.2intelligence-indexOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis43.6%tau2-bench-telecomOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis4.5%humanitys-last-examOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: common questions

Is Laguna S 2.1 better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 September 2026: #65 against #68. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Laguna S 2.1 cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.18/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.09/1M for Laguna S 2.1 and $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B open-weight models?

Laguna S 2.1: Restricted license. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Laguna S 2.1 and 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 3 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further