Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Ornith 1.5 397B (Ornith Ai) and Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 20 August 2026

As of 20 August 2026, Ornith 1.5 397B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#12 vs #19); and Ornith 1.5 397B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ornith 1.5 397B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #12 against #19 (74.2 vs 68.0 points).
  • you want to self-host: Ornith 1.5 397B ships open weights while Qwen3.7 Plus is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ornith 1.5 397B was listed 18 August 2026, Qwen3.7 Plus 3 June 2026.

Choose Qwen3.7 Plus if…

  • you want provider choice — 1 listed API providers against 0.

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.7 Plus: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.7 Plus
FieldOrnith 1.5 397BOrnith AiQwen3.7 PlusQwen
ModelCap Index position#12#19
Index score74.268.0
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.32
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$1.28
Context window— tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens—131K
API providers listed01
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed18 August 20263 June 2026
PublisherOrnith AiQwen

Evidence: start rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Public benchmark boards where Ornith 1.5 397B or Qwen3.7 Plus has a published result
BoardOrnith 1.5 397BQwen3.7 PlusLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)—15061499–1514Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena—-2.5%-3.8%–-1.2%Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—39.4intelligence-indexOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.7 Plus: common questions

Is Ornith 1.5 397B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Ornith 1.5 397B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 20 August 2026: #12 against #19. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Ornith 1.5 397B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Ornith 1.5 397B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Ornith 1.5 397B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.7 Plus open-weight models?

Ornith 1.5 397B: Open weights. Qwen3.7 Plus: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.7 Plus?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Ornith 1.5 397B and 1 for Qwen3.7 Plus, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 20 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further