Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) and Qwen3 Coder Next (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 9 September 2026
As of 9 September 2026, Qwen3 Coder Next holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#105 vs #107); Nemotron 3 Super is 2× cheaper per output token ($0.40/1M vs $0.80/1M); and Qwen3 Coder Next ships open weights.
Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Public benchmark boards where Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Coder Next has a published result
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Coder Next: common questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #105 against #107. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Nemotron 3 Super cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper on output tokens: $0.40/1M against $0.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.085/1M for Nemotron 3 Super and $0.12/1M for Qwen3 Coder Next. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.37 for Nemotron 3 Super versus $0.64 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Nemotron 3 Super costs 42.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Both publish a 262K-token context window.
Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Coder Next?
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Nemotron 3 Super 38.6%, Qwen3 Coder Next 38.2% — Nemotron 3 Super leads.
Are Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 Coder Next open-weight models?
Nemotron 3 Super: Restricted license. Qwen3 Coder Next: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 Coder Next?
ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Nemotron 3 Super and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.